Board Monitoring and Firm performance: Controlling for Endogeneity and Multicollinearity
نویسنده
چکیده
Purpose of this study is to investigate the relation between board monitoring and firm performance after controlling the endogeneity and multicollinearity problem that exist in most corporate governance research. Prior studies failed to establish any significant relationship between board monitoring and firm performance because of not properly control for endogeneity and multicollinearity problems. After controlling for both problems the coefficient of board monitoring increases and becomes significant. This study use different board monitoring characteristics: board size, number of board meetings, proportion of independent directors, background of directors CEO/Chair duality; and different characteristics of audit, compensation and nomination committees: number of meetings and proportion of independent directors. Firm performance is measured using return on assets and earning per share. Panel data of the top 500 listed companies from Australian Stock Exchange (ASX) is used over 3 years, from 2001 to 2003. This study concludes that the difference in the result is because addressing the problem properly using structural equation modelling. Board Monitoring and Firm performance: Controlling for Endogeneity and Multicollinearity Mohammad Azim School of Commerce University of South Australia Phone: 618 8302 7046 [email protected]
منابع مشابه
The Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK
We examine the impact of board size on firm performance for a large sample of 2,746 UK listed firms over 1981-2002. The UK provides an interesting institutional setting, because UK boards play a weak monitoring role and therefore any negative effect of large board size is likely to reflect the malfunction of the board’s advisory rather than monitoring role. We find that board size has a strong ...
متن کاملThe Impact of Board Size on Firm Performance: Evidence from the UK
We examine the impact of board size on firm performance for a large sample of 2,746 UK listed firms over 1981-2002. The UK provides an interesting institutional setting, because UK boards play a weak monitoring role and therefore any negative effect of large board size is likely to reflect the malfunction of the board’s advisory rather than monitoring role. We find that board size has a strong ...
متن کاملDoes governance make a difference to corporate performance in the financial crisis ? UK
This paper examines the effectiveness of internal corporate governance mechanisms for improving the performance of financial firms in the UK. Using Generalised Methods of Moments (GMM) estimates that control for dynamic endogeneity, this study shows that firm performance as measured by Total Shareholder Returns (TSR) and Return on Equity (ROE) is negatively associated with the level of non-comp...
متن کاملBoard of Diretor Education and Firm Performance: A Dynamic Approach
I examine the relationship between board of director’s (BoD) education and firm performance on a European dataset over the period from 1999 to 2013, employing a well-developed dynamic panel generalized method of moments (GMM) estimator to alleviate endogeneity issue in corporate governance study. I find no correlation between BoD education and firm’s return on asset, after accounting for endoge...
متن کاملNon-compliance, board structures and the performance of financial firms during crisis: UK Evidence
Copyright and Moral Rights for the articles on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. For more information on Open Research Online's data policy on reuse of materials please consult the policies page. Abstract This paper examines the effectiveness of internal corporate governance mechanisms for improving the performance of financial firms in the UK. The ...
متن کامل